Operational Review of Local Authority Care Homes

Overview

Independent reviews were undertaken for three local authorities operating multiple elderly care homes. The objective was to assess performance, cost structures, and long-term sustainability.


Key Findings

  • Staffing Levels: Consistently higher than comparable private operators, increasing cost without proportional benefit.

  • Maintenance Delays: Reliance on council procurement led to delays of 6–12 months or more, affecting occupancy and asset condition.

  • Underutilised Space: Floors and sections of homes were taken out of use pending refurbishment, often unresolved after extended periods; staff redeployed, inflating costs further.

  • Employee Costs: Enhanced sick pay correlated with higher absence levels. Local authority pensions were available but not widely understood.

  • Hidden Costs: Central overheads (estates, insurance, administration) were not allocated at home level, obscuring true operating costs.

  • Fee Structures: Although local authority homes were funded at slightly higher weekly rates (e.g. c.£900 vs £800 in the private sector), additional unaccounted central costs effectively added a further £700–£800 per bed per week. This created a significant hidden subsidy, masking the true cost of provision.


New Build Observations

  • Small-scale, high-spec nursing facilities (20–30 beds) commissioned within larger developments.

  • Multi-floor layouts increased staffing requirements and reduced efficiency.

  • Schemes were not aligned with viable operating models (typically 60–70 beds).

  • Decisions were made without sufficient operational insight, resulting in structurally uneconomic services.

  • Facilities were retained despite long-term cost implications not being fully recognised.


Outcomes & Recommendations

  • Introduce stronger commercial and performance-led oversight.

  • Improve cost transparency at individual home level.

  • Consider divestment to experienced independent operators.

  • Transition towards a commissioning model, securing capacity through agreed fee structures.

  • One authority acted on these recommendations, progressing the sale of approximately half of its care home portfolio to reduce costs and improve efficiency.

Previous
Previous

First-Time Operator Achieves £2m+ Profit on 48-Bed Care Home

Next
Next

Rapid Viability Review Prevents Insolvency